The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, explainedReviewed 9 November 2026
MPEP.netWysebridge Reference Read the MPEP free

Concepts

Impermissible Hindsight in the MPEP

Answer in brief

Impermissible hindsight is using the applicant's own disclosure as a roadmap to combine prior art. MPEP 2142 says it "must be avoided and the legal conclusion must be reached on the basis of the facts gleaned from the prior art". Any reconstruction is proper only if it relies on knowledge within ordinary skill at the time.

Where the MPEP addresses it

Making the argument

Show the rejection cites no reason in the prior art or ordinary knowledge for the combination, beyond what the application itself teaches.

Sources for this entry

  1. USPTO — MPEP § 2142 USPTO
    Official text of this section, Ninth Edition, Revision 01.2024.
  2. USPTO — MPEP § 2145 USPTO
    Official text of this section, Ninth Edition, Revision 01.2024.
  3. Wysebridge MPEP Center Wysebridge (publisher of this site)
    The full MPEP (9th Ed., Rev. 01.2024) free to read, with Wysebridge's estimated patent bar weight for each chapter.

Practical guidance is original editorial content. Company-published figures are the company's own claims and are labeled as such.

Continue this reading path

MPEP 2142: Prima Facie ObviousnessMPEP 2145: Rebutting an Obviousness RejectionTeaching Away in the MPEP

How the related websites connect

This is one of a coordinated collection of Wysebridge references. The related sites answer neighboring questions and share the same publisher entity, Wysebridge. They are not independent endorsements.

Explore related references · Wysebridge's official website ↗

Cite or share this entry

MPEP.net. “Impermissible Hindsight in the MPEP.” Wysebridge Reference. Content reviewed 9 November 2026.
https://mpep.net/hindsight/